Post by account_disabled on Jan 25, 2024 5:42:12 GMT
Environment against the associations of users of public services regarding sentence 64/2012, which observed that the ministries acted late and with incomplete information to the population about the risk of the presence of arsenic in water, considered that the regions fulfilled the obligations set out in the communication at different times, adopting necessary information measures according to budget availability [9] . Now, the importance of water is undeniable, whether as a drink or as food (food component). Whatever the contamination, whether chemical or microbiological, it must be communicated and resolved as soon as possible, as it is essential to guarantee a high level of protection for the health of citizens.
Despite everything, as the case of water with Buy Phone Number List arsenic demonstrates, the control to adapt to established values and timely inform consumers of the potential risks related to consumption was ineffective and unsuitable for producing the expected results.Furthermore, even if the reading of the political text were restricted to the chapter on the economic order, the rule contained in article 178 would not prevail either, given that it directly confronts a guiding principle of economic activity. It is imperative to remember that, although rules and principles are types of norms, principles are “optimization commandments”, which must be fulfilled according to “the legal and factual possibilities” of each situation, serving as a guide for the application of rules and guiding their application.
As a result, it does not seem permissible for the most beneficial interpretation to the consumer to be ignored, especially because these treaties would be hierarchically below the Federal Constitution, given that, when internalized, as they deal with rules of general international law, they would be considered equivalent to ordinary laws in the internal order, following the position of the Federal Supreme Court itself when judging Extraordinary Appeal 80.004/SE of 1977. And even human rights treaties, which is not the case with the Montreal Convention, are only supralegal, never superior to the Constitution. Thus, although the rule of article 178 of the Federal Constitution determines the observation of treaties, they must and can be observed, whether due to their natural, internal or external gaps (such as moral damages, which depend on the lex fori.
Despite everything, as the case of water with Buy Phone Number List arsenic demonstrates, the control to adapt to established values and timely inform consumers of the potential risks related to consumption was ineffective and unsuitable for producing the expected results.Furthermore, even if the reading of the political text were restricted to the chapter on the economic order, the rule contained in article 178 would not prevail either, given that it directly confronts a guiding principle of economic activity. It is imperative to remember that, although rules and principles are types of norms, principles are “optimization commandments”, which must be fulfilled according to “the legal and factual possibilities” of each situation, serving as a guide for the application of rules and guiding their application.
As a result, it does not seem permissible for the most beneficial interpretation to the consumer to be ignored, especially because these treaties would be hierarchically below the Federal Constitution, given that, when internalized, as they deal with rules of general international law, they would be considered equivalent to ordinary laws in the internal order, following the position of the Federal Supreme Court itself when judging Extraordinary Appeal 80.004/SE of 1977. And even human rights treaties, which is not the case with the Montreal Convention, are only supralegal, never superior to the Constitution. Thus, although the rule of article 178 of the Federal Constitution determines the observation of treaties, they must and can be observed, whether due to their natural, internal or external gaps (such as moral damages, which depend on the lex fori.